17
Mr.Bevin is at present in the country and is likely, I gather, to be there for some little time yet. While there he is not being troubled with any save the more urgent papers. I may be able to clear this with Sir Orme Sargent. Please let me have the draft of a letter to him telling him of the point raised by Mr.Crombie; of the conversation between the two Secretaries of State recorded in Mr.Creech Jones' minute on 54145; and asking whether he would agree to our giving
the Treasury an assurance as suggested in 1 of Mr.Seel's minute.
Th
Cord
22.5.47. m
1
I am sorry that it has been decided not to take action on the lines which Mr. Galsworthy and I suggested after discussion and careful consideration. In the absence of a Cabinet decision on Hong Kong there is of course no possibility of making a convincing reply to the first question in Mr. Crombie's letter. With all respect, I still feel that our best course is to proceed as in the draft submitted in my minute of the 17th of May.
If, however, we are going to seek a Ministerial assurance now, before replying to the Treasury, I urge that we should try to get one on the lines suggested in the last paragraph of my minute of the 15th of May on 54145/47, so that it will 1eet Cava the difficulties we are likely to encounter on the other problems mentioned in my minute on that file, particularly the airport. I imagine that this is essentially a case where we should avoid two bites at the cherry.
All of this will, of course, involve further delay in arriving at a decision on the University question. This was one of the aspects which Mr. Galsworthy and I had especially in mind when we recommended action as in the draft submitted in my minute of the 17th of May.
by mak
St. 5.47.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.